The word ‘deleted’ does not appear in RFC8749. The errata makes no sense. I suggest that this errata is REJECTED.
-- Mark Andrews > On 14 Sep 2022, at 06:30, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8749, > "Moving DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) to Historic Status". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7131 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: an <[email protected]> > > Section: 8749 > > Original Text > ------------- > deleted > > Corrected Text > -------------- > deleted one > > Notes > ----- > off rfc > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8749 (draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv-02) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Moving DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) to Historic > Status > Publication Date : March 2020 > Author(s) : W. Mekking, D. Mahoney > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Domain Name System Operations > Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
