On Oct 17, 2022, at 11:15 AM, John Scudder via Datatracker <[email protected]> wrote: > ## COMMENT > > ### Section 1 > > ~~~ > This document lists many (but not all) of the RFCs that should be > considered by someone creating an implementation of, or someone > deploying, modern DNSSEC. > ~~~ > > Why not list all the ones that should be considered? That seems like a bit of > a > tease! But maybe (probably?) you meant that the list is not guaranteed > comprehensive, in which case perhaps something like this > > ~~~ > This document lists RFCs that should be > considered by someone creating an implementation of, or someone > deploying, modern DNSSEC. Although an effort was made to be > thorough, it would be unwise for the reader to assume this list > is comprehensive. > ~~~ > > could be used. > > But maybe you meant exactly what you wrote, in which case, OK.
Thanks, this is a good suggestion. <https://github.com/paulehoffman/draft-hoffman-dnssec/commit/d2d28080> --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
