Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Éric Vyncke, INT AD, comments for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis-12 CC @evyncke Thank you for the work put into this document. Please find below some non-blocking COMMENT points (but replies would be appreciated even if only for my own education). I share Roman's feeling about the ISE stream rather than the IETF stream, especially since 'informative' is enough. Special thanks to Tim Wicinski for the shepherd's detailed write-up including the WG consensus *but* missing the justification of the intended status (even if the write-up alludes to informational is enough). Thanks to Jim Reid and Scott Rose who did the DNS directorate reviews of this document (even if the expectation of DNS directorate is to focus on documents from non DNS WGs): * https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis-10-dnsdir-lc-reid-2022-10-16/ * https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-dnsop-rfc5933-bis-12-dnsdir-telechat-rose-2022-11-02/ Alas no public reaction by the authors... I hope that this review helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric ## COMMENTS ### Consensus boilerplate It is missing ;-) ### Section 2.2 Suggest to add a RFC editor note with a request to update the text when the official allocation is known (and redo the math of course). Last paragraph of section 10 should be more detailed. ## Notes This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into individual GitHub issues. [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
