On 15/12/2022 14.45, Peter Thomassen wrote:
In what sense is this document "informational" when it is called "validator requirements", or, conversely, in what sense does it spell out "requirements" when it is only "informational" and not "standards track"?
The current *title* says "Recommendations". I don't think the draft name matters much, especially after it becomes an RFC.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
