Hi Roman,
Thank you for your review.
On 12/31/22 00:16, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker wrote:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you to Catherine Meadows for the SECDIR review.
I support Murray Kucherawy DISCUSS position.
The authors will respond to both of these reviews once we've been able to deal
with the points raised.
** Section 3.
Catalog consumers MUST ignore any RR in the catalog zone which is
meaningless to or otherwise not supported by the implementation.
Can “meaningless” be more formally described? Are there specific RR which
shouldn’t be in the catalog?
This was raised as well by Catherine Meadows and Russ Housley. To hold not up
the below, we'll address it in the response to their reviews.
** Section 3. Editorial.
The content of catalog zones may not be
accessible from any recursive nameserver.
Can the intent of this be clarified? Is it saying that the “contents of the
catalog zone may _not necessarily_ be accessible from _all or some_ recursive
nameservers”? or the “contents of the catalog zone _should not be/must not be_
accessible from any recursive nameserver”?
We meant the former, and clarified the wording. The change is part of the
following PR that will be merged along with changes from other reviews:
https://github.com/NLnetLabs/draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones/pull/55/commits
Best,
Peter
--
https://desec.io/
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
