On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 8:50 AM Peter Thomassen <pe...@desec.io> wrote:
> Hi Éric, > > Thank you for your review! > > On 1/2/23 14:59, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > # Éric Vyncke, INT AD, comments for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-08 > > CC @evyncke > > > > Thank you for the work put into this document. I really like the ideas > behind > > this IETF draft (OTOH, DNS is now used as a control/transport protocol > pretty > > much BGP nowadays...). But, I second Murray's DISCUSS point about IANA > (and his > > ask to get an example because the whole document is not really easy to > read for > > a non expert). > > We will add both a IANA section and an appendix with a full example. > > They can be previewed in this PR, where we are collecting changes > triggered by the current round of feedback: > https://github.com/NLnetLabs/draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones/pull/55 > [...] > I can see you've added the "no actions" IANA section, which solves part of my DISCUSS. But I'd also like to understand why it is that handling names via IANA was rejected. Was this discussed in the WG? -MSK
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
