Thank you Paul and Kazunori.
The chairs agree that both drafts (glue-is-not-optional and rfc8499bis)
should go to WG Last Call together. We will coordinate this further
with the authors of both documents to move forward with the WGLC.
Best,
-- Suzanne, Tim and Benno
On 20/01/2023 16:34, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Greetings again. Kazunori and I have just submitted -05 of this draft to
incorporate the consensus from the WG on how to talk about the types of glue.
Please see the diff for the specific wording that was used to reflect the WG
consensus. Note that we now normatively reference
draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional because that draft explains what to do
with the definitions in this draft.
(I have no idea why there are those "skipping" sections; I'll report the bug.)
This is now ready for WG Last Call. The chairs should move
draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional and draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis to WG
Last Call together.
--Paul Hoffman
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
