On Thu, 9 Feb 2023, Tim Wicinski wrote:
Big fan of this document and feel it is good. I have only one small nit:See also "domain name" in [RFC8499]. Should this not be "Domain name" (per 8499) ? I have a deeper question on using "ext" for extension - it feels like an abbreviation which doesn't feel useful. But I'm no expert on matters of the written word.
Would you prefer "private" ? As in Private Use ? Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
