Thank you authors for the update which addressed my concern about formatting of the special use considerations as an enumerated list.
Forgive me if I am being difficult, but I feel that the first sentence of the privacy section, which says “... so should not attempt to be resolved using the global DNS” is in contradiction with #4 which says "and SHOULD NOT perform any special handling”, and to some extent #3 which says "Regular DNS resolution APIs and libraries are not expected to recognize or treat names in the .alt pseudo-TLD differently”. Given the wording of the considerations in section 3.2, maybe just delete “, and so...” from that sentence in the privacy section? DW > On Feb 24, 2023, at 10:42 AM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of > the IETF. > > Title : The ALT Special Use Top Level Domain > Authors : Warren Kumari > Paul Hoffman > Filename : draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-21.txt > Pages : 12 > Date : 2023-02-24 > > Abstract: > This document reserves a TLD label, "alt" to be used in non-DNS > contexts. It also provides advice and guidance to developers > developing alternative namespaces. > > _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
