Dear WG,
Thank you for your feedback, also from Peter Thomassen in another email
thread about the glue definition.
Herewith I close the WGLC.
Best,
-- Benno
On 20/02/2023 15:37, Sara Dickinson wrote:
Hi,
LGTM.
I’ve opened a small PR to just update the DoQ references now there is an RFC:
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis/pull/12
Regards
Sara.
On 17 Feb 2023, at 15:51, Benno Overeinder <be...@nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
Dear DNSOP WG,
Following the latest consultation with the Working Group on bailiwick and
in-domain/sibling name servers terminology, the authors and chairs believe this
document has reached the stage of being ready for Working Group Last Call.
Due to normative reference to draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional (because
that draft explains what to do with the definitions in this draft), both drafts
will go to WGLC together. (WGLC for glue-is-not-optional will be issued early
next week.)
This starts a Working Group Last Call for: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis.
Current versions of the draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis/.
The Current Intended Status of this document is: Best Current Practice.
Please review the draft and offer relevant comments.
If this does not seem appropriate please speak out.
If someone feels the document is *not* ready for publication, please speak out
with your reasons.
Supporting statements that the document is ready are also welcome.
This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends on: March 3rd
2023
Thanks,
-- Benno
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
