It appears that Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >Happy Monday (UTC) All, > >The chairs heard some strong support to adopt and work on this. > >This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-huque-dnsop-compact-lies > >The authors did do some updates in the draft around the "lies" moniker. >Once adopted perhaps someone can suggest a better draft name. > >The draft is available here: >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huque-dnsop-compact-lies/ > >Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption >by DNSOP, and send any comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
I think we should adopt it but I am quite unhappy that in its current form, there is no way for clients to tell when a server is using this hack, and it silently turns NXDOMAIN into NODATA for existing clients that haven't added code to look for NXNAME. I would be OK with an EDNS0 "tell me lies" flag from the client. It would only affect NXDOMAIN resposnes, which could use the NXNAME hack if the flag is set, otherwise the server has to return a real NXDOMAIN. R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
