On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 4:04 AM, Éric Vyncke <[email protected]> wrote:
> Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-23: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/ > handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle > DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/ > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks to the authors and the DNSOP working group, and of course to > Suzanne for a detailed shepherd's write-up. > > Important document to bring some clarity for some use cases. > > Just two minor comments: > > 1/ I support Paul Wouters' issue with the name "pseudo-TLD", it is both > too late and a bike-shedding exercice... "ghost-TLD" or "filler-TLD" or > "dummy-TLD" would have been better > We had chosen pseudo-TLD because it acts like a TLD, and quacks like a TLD, but it isn't actually a TLD because, well, it isn't a Top Level *Domain* — it's more like a Top Level Reservation. If we'd done this all again, perhaps we would have selected a different term, but at this point it's been 9 years, 2 months and 16 days, and changing it now would indeed be too late… > 2/ in section 2, s/because .alt, by definition, is not a DNS name./because > .alt, by this specification, is not a DNS name./ ? > Thank you, I've made that change in the editors copy… W > > Regards > > -éric >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
