Hi Ben, DNSOP,
thank you so much for your reading and comments. We considered both of
your suggestions useful, and substantially updated the document to
reflect them:
- for each EDNS option, abstract name, type and value are defined, and
both presentation and JSON formats are derived from those, leading to
mutual unification
- the presentation format is as similar as arguably possible to
current dig/kdig text output
The new version of the draft can be seen here:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-peltan-edns-presentation-format-02.html
We also already have a piece of "running code": kdig 3.3.2 implements
both JSON and presentation format in accordance to the draft.
We think this might be of interest of DNSOP.
Thanks,
Libor
Dne 29. 08. 23 v 19:01 Ben Schwartz napsal(a):
I have reviewed this draft. It seems potentially useful and like a
reasonable attempt to define a solution.
I would like to see a unified rule connecting the text and JSON
representations, rather than explicitly defining new formats for each
key (and in some cases even changing the key names, e.g. NSID vs.
NSIDHEX). For example, some options could be defined as having "list"
type output, and then we could define generically how list values are
represented in JSON and text. Similarly for numbers, strings, etc.
Alternatively, the JSON format could be defined first, and the text
format could be defined via an algorithm that acts generically on the
JSON values.
I think it's worth taking a close look at the existing commonly used
presentation formats before defining a new one. For example, it might
be worthwhile to standardize a text representation that is closer to
the current "dig" output, for the sake of compatibility with existing
systems.
--Ben Schwartz
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* DNSOP <[email protected]> on behalf of libor.peltan
<[email protected]>
*Sent:* Wednesday, May 31, 2023 4:33 AM
*To:* dnsop <[email protected]>
*Subject:* [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for
draft-peltan-edns-presentation-format-01.txt
Hi dsnop, we'd like to turn your attention again to our draft
https: //www. ietf. org/archive/id/draft-peltan-edns-presentation-format-01. html
We believe this document shall fill a missing gap in specifications,
and help interoperability of DNS
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Hi dsnop,
we'd like to turn your attention again to our draft
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-peltan-edns-presentation-format-01.html
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-peltan-edns-presentation-format-01.html>
We believe this document shall fill a missing gap in specifications,
and help interoperability of DNS tools. Therefore, we think it'd make
sense if this document once becomes a dnsop-homed RFC.
We'd appreciate your feedback and comments.
Update from -00: added Guidelines for Future EDNS(0) Options (thanks
to Pieter Lexis); nitpicks.
Thank you!
Libor and Tom
-------- Přeposlaná zpráva --------
Předmět: New Version Notification for
draft-peltan-edns-presentation-format-01.txt
Datum: Wed, 31 May 2023 01:30:33 -0700
Od: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Komu: Libor Peltan <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>, Tom Carpay <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
A new version of I-D, draft-peltan-edns-presentation-format-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Libor Peltan and posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-peltan-edns-presentation-format
Revision: 01
Title: EDNS Presentation and JSON Format
Document date: 2023-05-31
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 20
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-peltan-edns-presentation-format-01.txt
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-peltan-edns-presentation-format-01.txt>
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peltan-edns-presentation-format/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peltan-edns-presentation-format/>
Htmlized:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-peltan-edns-presentation-format
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-peltan-edns-presentation-format>
Diff:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-peltan-edns-presentation-format-01
<https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-peltan-edns-presentation-format-01>
Abstract:
This document describes textual and JSON representation format of
EDNS option. It also modifies the escaping rules of JSON
representation of DNS messages, previously defined in RFC8427.
The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop