Hi Warren, We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial. Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata report to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review and set the Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/).
You may review the report at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7689 Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ for further information on how to verify errata reports. Further information on errata can be found at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php. Thank you. RFC Editor/rv > On Oct 26, 2023, at 3:30 PM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8906, > "A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers: Failure to Communicate". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7689 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Josh Soref <[email protected]> > > Section: 8.2.8 > > Original Text > ------------- > expect: DO=1 to be present if an RRSIG is in the response > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > expect: flag: do to be present if ... > > Notes > ----- > The same section has `expect: flag: aa to be present`, and when running the > suggested command, no `DO=1` is shown, which makes the advice unhelpful. > > Sample command: > ``` > $ dig +nocookie +edns=0 +noad +norec +dnssec soa $zone @$server > > ; <<>> DiG 9.16.44-Debian <<>> +nocookie +edns +noad +norec +dnssec soa > powerdns.com @2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fe55:e54d > ;; global options: +cmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: REFUSED, id: 45268 > ;; flags: qr; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 > > ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: > ; EDNS: version: 0, flags: do; udp: 1232 > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;powerdns.com. IN SOA > > ;; Query time: 0 msec > ;; SERVER: 2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fe55:e54d#53(2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fe55:e54d) > ;; WHEN: Thu Oct 26 22:26:44 UTC 2023 > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 41 > ``` > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it > will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8906 (draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-23) > -------------------------------------- > Title : A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers: Failure to > Communicate > Publication Date : September 2020 > Author(s) : M. Andrews, R. Bellis > Category : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE > Source : Domain Name System Operations > Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
