On Oct 31, 2023, at 19:17, Frederico A C Neves <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear David, > > Section 7 of the draft is sufficiently clear, precise, and complete. > > This registration at the time it is approved by the IESG, taking in > account the fact that currently there is no other request for TXT _er > on the "virtual request queue", is reviewed as OK and approved.
I agree, although I do wonder what “er” stands for. Error Report? Why not use “_err” which is more intuitively an error ? Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
