Doh! That is correct… Thank you! W
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 8:59 AM, Joe Abley <[email protected]> wrote: > Verified. > > On 31 Oct 2023, at 04:10, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8806, > "Running a Root Server Local to a Resolver". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7692 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Deliang Chang <[email protected]> > > Section: 3 > > Original Text > ------------- > There is a risk that a system using a local authoritative server for the > root zone cannot refresh the contents of the root zone before the expire > time in the SOA. A system using a local authoritative server for the root > zone MUST NOT serve stale data for the root zone. To mitigate the risk that > stale data is served, the local root server MUST immediately switch to > using non-local root servers when it detects that it would be serving state > data. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > There is a risk that a system using a local authoritative server for the > root zone cannot refresh the contents of the root zone before the expire > time in the SOA. A system using a local authoritative server for the root > zone MUST NOT serve stale data for the root zone. To mitigate the risk that > stale data is served, the local root server MUST immediately switch to > using non-local root servers when it detects that it would be serving stale > data. > > Notes > ----- > Based on the context, it seems that in the last sentence the intended word > is "stale" as in stale data, instead of "state". So, I believe there might > be a typo in the text, and the correct interpretation would be to swith > back to the non-local root when stale data is detected. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it will be > removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please use "Reply All" to > discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is > reached, the verifying party will log in to change the status and edit the > report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8806 (draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-12) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Running a Root Server Local to a Resolver Publication Date : June > 2020 > Author(s) : W. Kumari, P. Hoffman > Category : INFORMATIONAL > Source : Domain Name System Operations Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
