One more nudge on this, before the deadline tomorrow. --Paul Hoffman
On Jun 5, 2024, at 09:28, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Tim jumped the gun by about an hour: we just submitted the -05. It > incorporates the suggested text from below; you can see the diff at: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis-05 > > FWIW, this new text is somewhat based on the findings from NLnetLabs and SIDN > on a project supported by ICANN. You can see the report, and an earlier > report on a related topic, at: > > https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/octo-commissioned-documents-2020-11-05-en > > Please let us know if you have any issues with the changed text in the new > version. > > --Paul Hoffman > > > On Jun 5, 2024, at 08:25, Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> All >> >> The chairs are requesting some final comments on >> draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis. As you might recall, this document has already >> been through WGLC and had consensus to advance, but our AD reviewed it and >> raised some additional questions. (Warren Kumari, “AD Review of >> draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis,” email to the list on 31 January.) _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
