Speaking Personally, these all three seem reasonable. I can easily see a reason for the second error code (local root), especially as a debugging/test case.
Also personally, I feel like the DNS community needs a quality error code similar to HTTP 418. But I will shut up and show myself out. tim PS - for reference https://http.cat/ On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 9:24 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer <[email protected]> wrote: > In the current registry for Extended DNS Error Codes (RFC 8914), there > are codes that may be interesting to add: > > * One to say that the response was deliberately minimal (RFC 8482) > * One to say that the response comes from a local root (RFC 8806) > * One to say that the response has been tailored because of ECS (RFC > 7871) [the most useful, IMHO] > > I am thinking about asking for a registration. Policy for this > registry is "first come, first served". Before I start sending email > to IANA, I ask your advice. Is it a good idea? Will the authors of > resolver / authoritative software use it? > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
