On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 6:25 PM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2024, at 14:41, A L <[email protected]> wrote: > > To use the "search" function one needs to know if a term is at all > defined. To the reader, it may not be obvious if there's a term or just a > word. Having alphabetical order, can establish the fact quite quickly. > > Again, this was discussed in the WG and the IETF. What you are proposing > is not an errata, it is a suggestion for a different format. The errata > process is not the correct way to suggest these things. > In general, having the entries ordered alphabetically makes sense, but in this particular case the WG discussed this and it was decided to keep this particular design. So, thank you for the Errata, but I will be rejecting it. Thanks again, W > Alternatively, the document can contain an alphabetical index of _all_ > terms defined within (not just the newly introduced ones). > > This proposal confuses me. Isn't that what the current index in the > document does? > > --Paul Hoffman > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
