On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 4:11 AM Antoine Fressancourt via Datatracker < [email protected]> wrote:
> Reviewer: Antoine Fressancourt > Review result: Ready > [...] > Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as > YES or > NO OBJECTION. > > The document is very clearly written, and understandable. > Thank you for your review Antoine. > A (very) minor remark I have about the document is that, regarding the > presentation of the DNS record, I would better present how those records > are > structured (Which field is where), for instance in sections 3.1, 3.4 or 4. > The document assumes that its intended readers are already familiar with the presentation format of DNS records (and the DNS protocol more generally), so we did not feel the need to do this. We are considering your request though. Perhaps, a pointer to other documents that cover the presentation format would be sufficient. Besides, the DNS record example in section 4 is not readable in printed > versions of the document (Yes, I am old school). > I've made a small update to the draft to split the NSEC3 record example across multiple lines. It will be in the next published revision, but you can see it in the github repo at https://github.com/shuque/id-dnssec-compact-lies . Thanks! Shumon.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
