Thank you Shumon. I’ll clear my discuss. Take care. G/
From: Shumon Huque <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2025 9:17 PM To: Gunter van de Velde (Nokia) <[email protected]> Cc: The IESG <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: Gunter Van de Velde's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 1:14 AM Gunter Van de Velde via Datatracker <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Gunter Van de Velde has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-06: Discuss Thank you for your review, Gunter. # In this review you find a simple to resolve DISCUSS and a general review with non-blocking COMMENTs # DISCUSS # ======= # The Requirement's Language (BCP14) sections seems missing? I am sure this is an accidental oversight. BCP14 text looks as follows: " 1.1. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. " I've added this to the draft revision in github. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # General Review # ============== ## idnits point to a downref RFC 7129 (ISE stream) that is not in the downref register. It was mentioned during LC. I think the easiest thing would be to move 7129 to Informative References, which I've also done. # I am rarely working with DNS technology and hence i tend to get lost easily in related acronyms. Would a terminology/reference section make sense for these (NSEC, NSEC3, Empty Non-Terminal names, RRSIGs, etc)? I've added a reference to RFC8499 (DNS Terminology) and included the following paragraph, which also appears in another recently published DNS related RFC (9471) to address this same concern: This document assumes a reasonable level of familiarity with DNS operations and protocol terms. Much of the terminology is explained in further detail in "DNS Terminology" [RFC8499]. Shumon.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
