From: Tobias Fiebig <[email protected]> Sent: 07 April 2025 11:21
Moin, I just uploaded a new version of the document. I made the following changes: - Added text on stubs (following the discussion on v6ops) - Added text on fragmentation/resolution failure due to MTU black- holes and broken fragmentation. - Some minor editorial/wording things. I would appreciate it if people could give the document another read. <tp> Looks good. "In this document, we discuss" I did see a LC comment recently deprecating the use of personal pronouns. Perhaps 'This document discusses:' p.6 /povide/provide/ 1232b. The convention I have lived with is that 'b' is bit and 'B' is byte although some say 'b' is 1000 and 'B' is 1024; I prefer to see it spelled out EDNS0 could do with a reference; and should it be EDNS(0) as in the References? 'name space' or 'namespace' I think the latter in this context Is that Japanese ideograms in the Authors Addresses? Tom Petch p.s. What is 'moin'? With best regards, Tobias On Mon, 2025-04-07 at 03:17 -0700, [email protected] wrote: > A new version of Internet-Draft draft-ietf-dnsop-3901bis-02.txt has > been > successfully submitted by Tobias Fiebig and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-ietf-dnsop-3901bis > Revision: 02 > Title: DNS IPv6 Transport Operational Guidelines > Date: 2025-04-07 > Group: dnsop > Pages: 12 > URL: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-3901bis-02.txt > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-3901bis/ > HTML: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-3901bis-02.html > HTMLized: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-3901bis > Diff: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-3901bis-02 > > Abstract: > > This memo provides guidelines and documents Best Current Practice > for > operating authoritative DNS servers as well as recursive and stub > DNS > resolvers, given that queries and responses are carried in a mixed > environment of IPv4 and IPv6 networks. This document expands on > RFC > 3901 by recommending that authoritative DNS servers as well as > recursive DNS resolvers support both IPv4 and IPv6. It > furthermore > provides guidance on recursive DNS resolver selection for stub DNS > resolvers. > > This document obsoletes RFC3901. (if approved) > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > -- Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig T +31 616 80 98 99 M [email protected] Pronouns: he/him/his _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
