> Please review the draft and share your thoughts on the mailing > list, clearly stating whether you support its adoption by DNSOP. > Also let us know if you are willing to contribute text, provide > reviews, or help in other ways.
The current draft contains the following text: DNSSEC validating resolvers will fail to resolve names ending in "internal". In my opinion we should not have a specification that leads to DNSSEC validation errors. One option is to simply not have a draft at all. The IETF is not in charge of the DNS namespace. The IETF deals with technical aspects of DNS. A second option is to have a draft that recommends against using this domain because doing so leads to DNSSEC validation errors. So the points in Section 5.1 (in particular point 1) should be changed that the use is not recommended. A third option is to find a way to avoid DNSSEC validation errors. That is not a technical problem, there are multiple ways. But it seems that none of those is acceptable. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
