On Apr 21, 2025, at 15:19, Wes Hardaker <[email protected]> wrote:
. . . >> # BCP237 Umbrella >> >> As a big fun of BCP237, I wonder whether we should make this more visible in >> our DNSSEC “roadmap” documentation and list this document under the BCP237 >> umbrella? > > So BCP237 currently only has one document within it (RFC9364). I think > if we added every future DNSSEC document to the BCP it would likely get > overwhelming. I would argue that whether or not and how often we should > update BCP237 is a good discussion for the WG as a whole, but it's > outside the scope of this particular document (set). But that's very much > IMHO. As the (current) author of BCP 237, I fully agree with Wes here. It is now a bit over two years old; starting an update later this year seems appropriate, even if it just adds a few bullet points for new documents. Doing so absolutely should not block this draft. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
