On 23 Apr 2025, at 18:11, Kim Davies <[email protected]> wrote: > Quoting Petr Spacek on Tuesday April 22, 2025: >>> >>> The fact of the matter is that some people want "no delegation" and some >>> people want "insecure delegation". That ship has sailed, and we ended up >>> with "no delegation". DNSOP can´t change that. >> >> Just to clarify: Are you suggesting ICANN board cannot ever issue another >> resolution on this matter? > > I don't think that's true. We have a situation where SSAC specifically > stated the domain should not be delegated in the root zone, it is a > constraint that the ICANN Board codified in accepting SSAC's advice, and > thus that is the constraint we have today.
For what it's worth, it seems to me that the intent of that recommendation was that the domain should not be delegated in the ICANN policy sense, not in the technical DNS sense. This seems similar to confusion I remember in the past about the word "redelegation", which in the DNS means the same thing as "change the nameservers" but in an ICANN policy sense meant "recognise a change of the organisation responsible for the TLD". Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
