Ketan Talaulikar <[email protected]> writes: > How much of RFC9157 is left over from whatever is being > updated/obsoleted by this document? Would it not be nicer to simplify > things and reduce the pointers back/forth between all these RFCs > since 9157 is in turn updating 3 RFCs and one of them is RFC8624?
IMHO, no... It may be wise to update 9157 though so it thus only talks about NSEC3 in the future and removes the discussion about algorithms from 8624. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
