> On Jun 11, 2025, at 06:29, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't think any of this is wrong per se, but I also think it is vast > overkill, the threats are > largely if not entirely hypothetical, and this will add a lot of complication > that distracts from the > goal of this draft, to provide a consistent form for these records so you can > tell where they're from > and if they're likely still to be useful.
I agree here. The main target audience is non-dns people implementing DCV. Paul _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
