Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-dnsop-04-00: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dnsop/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ** What DNS topics are out of scope in the WG? As framed, it appears that nearly everything related to the “DNS protocol” would be in scope – BCPs for “DNS protocols (Sentence 1), documents from DNS operators (Sentence 2), and “maintenance, updates, and extensions to the DNS protocol” (Sentence 3). In what way is this scope different than DPRIVE, DELEG, or DNSSD that are also defining elements of the "DNS protocol"? ** Per “DNSOP provides a venue for DNS operators and other interested parties to engage in discussions around the operational requirements of DNS and publish documents”, what kind of documents are being published? ** Without specificity, isn’t this statement of “The WG will engage with relevant WGs and other appropriate organizations whenever collaboration is needed” true for any WG. How does this shape the behavior of the WG? Can it be more specific? _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
