On Sun, Oct 19, 2025 at 11:00:22AM +0100, Jim Reid wrote:
> > On 19 Oct 2025, at 04:39, Viktor Dukhovni <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > My message to the WG is in essence to be sparing in defining RRTYPEs
> > with extensible field subtypes.
>
> I thought this WG decided a long time ago that subtyping was bad. It
> didn't get written up as an RFC though.
A consensus in that direction would be good. Though in the particular
case of AMTRELAY, the relevant WG was "mboned", and I guess the DNS
aspect of RFC 8777 would have had at best cursory review in "dnsop".
So perhaps this is more of a topic for the DNS Directorate.
--
Viktor. 🇺🇦 Слава Україні!
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
