David Farmer <[email protected]> wrote: > The first two sub-registries, the IPv4 and IPv6 Locally-Served DNS Zone > Registries, should be changed to "Expert Review". However, with an > additional restriction that allows only address blocks from one of the > Special-Purpose Address Space registries to be added to the > corresponding Locally-Served DNS Zones registry. Except when an address > block is concurrently added to both registries.
I would have gone for _IESG Approval_, but a well written Expert Review would
be okay. I'm just sad that we didn't think to put this into RFC9637.
I feel like that was a failure of DNSDIR review.... which this document did
not get. I feel the IESG ought to be able to fix this without a new RFC.
Maybe there should be a shephard question about DNS stuff.
> IPv6 Documentation Address Space. However, adding an address block to
> the IPv4 or IPv6 Locally-Served DNS Zone Registries effectively makes
> it a special-purpose address block. So, requiring Special-Purpose
> Address Space designation before or concurrent with the addition to the
> Locally-Served DNS Zone Registries seems appropriate.
True.
> However, I'm not sure that "Expert Review" is the appropriate registry
> procedure for the other two sub-registries, the Transport-Independent
> Locally-Served DNS Zone Registry, and the service.arpa Subdomain
> registry.
It depends upon the experts ;-)
My biggest fear as a DE for some very minor registries isn't that I'll make a
mistake, but that I'll lose the email and cause multi-month delays.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
