On Sat, Nov 29, 2025 at 5:28 PM Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2025, at 13:06, Shumon Huque <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I think merging this into draft-eastlake-rfc6895bis-iana-01 is a fine > idea. > > I do not. draft-eastlake-dnsop-rfc6895bis-iana (note the correct file name > has not yet been considered by the WG. It is a minor update, and the > changes in it mostly just reflect what's already in the IANA registries. It > is not at all clear if the WG will adopt it. > Note that draft-huque-dnsop-private-metatypes has also not really been considered by the WG beyond the recent mentions in this thread. If that is incorporated into the proposed 6895bis, that would be a more substantial update. I was originally thinking the DELEXT rr types proposal could also be incorporated, but it sounds like you (and others) think that should be part of a more deleg specific effort. That said, I'm also okay with pursuing private-metatypes as a separate document. Also note that draft-arends-dnsop-delext will need to change as the DELEG > WG moves forward. I think it is better to have those changes reflected in a > DNSOP WG document that is specific to delegation. It is much more than just > some IANA considerations. > My draft also goes a bit beyond IANA considerations as I previously remarked (by formalizing resolver behavior for unknown q and meta-types). Shumon.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
