Moin,
Thank you for your detailed review. > 1. It is too bad that the referenced document for [DNSFlagDay2020] > has an invalid certificate. Thank you for noticing that. I reached out and asked whether the certificate can be renewed. > 2. The two references to this document also use “following > [DNSFlagDay2020]” and the “following” is a bit confusing without > reviewing the reference given that following is also time based and > the reference might be interpreted as a date reference rather than > informational as to why the EDNS(0) size is recommended. Perhaps use > “as per” or some other text? The text is adjusted as you suggested in this PR: https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-3901bis/pull/63 Could you please check and see if this addresses your concern? > While the document is close, please see Geoff Huston’s DNSDIR review > comments as he did a thorough job and no need to repeat some of the > same issues I found. I hear you echoing all issues from the DNSDIR review. I would appreciate it if you could review the response to the review in [email protected], and provide feedback on whether the implemented changes/PRs and explanations there address the concerns you have voiced. Feedback would be highly appreciated. With best regards, Tobias -- Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig T +31 616 80 98 99 M [email protected] Pronouns: he/him/his _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
