> We propose to explicitly reference RFC 6540 (BCP 177) in the introduction. > https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-3901bis/pull/65 > > I hope this change addresses your concern.
No, it does not address my concern. RFC 6540 was an aspirational document, and then (and now) it does not document current operational practices. In my view it was erroneously published as a BCP. The same considerations apply to this draft. regards, Geoff
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
