Hi Tobias,
[Cc trimmed]
At 11:51 PM 18-01-2026, Tobias Fiebig wrote:
please excuse my belated reply to the comments of the the last days. I
will also reply to the contents of the other two messages later today.
However, I also believe that we need to talk about an elephant in the
room concerning the two concerns voiced about missing consideration of
Geoff's two reviews. Please understand that I make below comments as an
individual to further contextualize these concerns. Opinions and
conclusions stated are my own and have not been coordinated with my co-
editors, chairs, or our area director.
First of all, thank you for sharing the explanation. I glanced
through the reviewer's comments and then read version -10 of the draft.
There are good things in the draft, in my opinion, e.g. the
"geographically diverse and operate under different routing policies"
in Section 4.1. The "Technical requirements for authoritative name
servers" are, from what I understand, used for the DNS Root Zone and
top-level domains which fall within the scope of IANA. Some of the
audience of the draft might not have access to similar resources to
implement those requirements. Furthermore, the constraints might be different.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
