Mark Nottingham <[email protected]> wrote: > So, the use case we were interested in was when legally-mandated > filtering was happening; apologies if I haven't used the WG's > terminology correctly.
My example was certainly silly, but I'm assuming these western separatists
passed a law. But, IANA has caught up.
> Other forms of filtering are less interesting (at least to me), and I'd
> be concerned that supporting them could be seen as encouraging
> opinionated (rather than legally-driven) filtering by intermediaries.
Malware site filtering could very well be legally mandated, so I'm not sure I
understand what distinction you are trying to make.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
