Dear Peter,
Thank you for your interest. We do really mean that we will try with IETF
126 and will get the feedback during the discussion in IETF 125, and we will
let the list know the follow-up once we make our decision.
Yours,
Jun Zhang
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Thomassen <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2026 9:03 AM
To: junzhang <[email protected]>; Ondřej Surý <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]; Andrzej Duda <[email protected]>; Houda Labiod
<[email protected]>; Maciej Korczynski
<[email protected]>; olivier hureau <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Re: New individual draft for discussion: A DNS-Based
Framework for Privacy-Preserving Identity
Hi Jun,
On 3/16/26 15:55, junzhang wrote:
> Thank you for the comments. We do find that there are some proposals
> on the DNS-based framework in today’s side meetings. We will get some
> feedbacks from IETFers and decide whether side meeting or BoF is a good fit.
That seems like a good idea.
To prevent a misunderstanding: I consider it unlikely that any of the side
meetings this week will agree to discuss your draft; they already have their
own things on their agenda.
If you'd like to hold a side meeting, that would probably make most sense to do
at IETF 126. Information on how to request a side meeting will be published at
https://www.ietf.org/meeting/side-meetings/ in due time.
On a personal note, I'm quite interested in this topic and have had similar
ideas before (under the name DNS-ID), although never published it. It would be
nice if you could let me (or this list, in a short post) know where you end up
taking this. Thanks!
Best,
Peter
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
