Moin! On 1 Apr 2026, at 17:47, Dave Lawrence wrote:
> Shane Kerr writes: >> One thing that I really like about the draft is that it documents >> refreshing TTL values for NS on any lookup at the parent. This is >> probably something resolver implementers already do, but writing it >> down seems useful. > > It would seem to obviate 11 versions and over 6 years of work on > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation/ > > Or maybe not. I haven't tried to reconcile them. Section 9.3 in this document does that. This is about implementation deciding to do re validation or do what Ondrejs draft proposes. We currently have both and I think that is fine. So long -Ralf --- Ralf Weber _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
