On Thu, Apr 9, 2026 at 11:19 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
> Brian raised a question about the plan for RFC 6147 [2]. Given that DNS64 > is also widely implemented and deployed and that there is only one minor > erratum that does not impact interop [3], I think that we can proceed with > a status change for RFC6147 and progress NAT64/DNS64 as a set this round as > well. > > > > Please share you thoughts on this plan by 23/04/2026. > That approach makes sense to me. I don't see any issues with it. Thanks, Scott
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
