Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > As a process issue, I don't think that DNS64 can be moved to Internet > Standard and at the same time add wording to it that says how it should > or should not be used on the Internet.
We are allowed to edit/clarify when we move to IS.
(We are also strongly encouraged to rip out anything that has no deployment)
> I also don't think RFC 6147 *has* to be moved to Internet Standard at
> the same time as other IPv6ish things are being moved up. Because of
> the significant amount of hesitancy shown, I don't think it is
> appropriate to move the standard up without a revision of its use and
> applicability statements. If those are accepted, it can be moved to IS
> a few years later.
I see removing applicability to be consistent with going to IS.
We nuked IA_TA out of DHCPv6 (STD102) between 8415 and 9915.
{Temporary addresses are obsoleted)
It's not forbidden. It's just obsolete going forward.
I think that the only time we have to reset the timer is when we change bits
in the wire.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
] My working hours and your working hours may be different. [
] Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
