Hi Tim, all,

Thank you for publishing a new version: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dnsop-rfc6303-bis/01/. In your opinion, 
what would be the next step to make some progress here?

Adding 6man and DNSOP as this touches registries defined by these WGs.

Cheers,
Med

De : Nick Buraglio <[email protected]>
Envoyé : mercredi 25 février 2026 17:25
À : Tim Wicinski <[email protected]>
Cc : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <[email protected]>; list 
<[email protected]>
Objet : Re: [v6ops] Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for 
draft-dnsop-rfc6303-bis-00.txt


Hi Tim. We were discussing this as part of the v6ops AD call prior to IETF 125 
- is there any movement on this draft? What can we help with?

nb

On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 12:48 PM Tim Wicinski 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Med

Thanks for the suggestions ! I wanted to get something in place and I poked Mr 
Farmer hoping for his insights.

And I realized after I published the version it's not a -bis also.

I'll clean this up today/tomorrow.

tim


On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 7:53 AM 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Tim,

Thank you for editing the -00.

I think that the doc should also update RFC6890 per the discussion we had with 
David. The update to 6890 is about adding a new column to indicate whether an 
entry in the registry is eligible to being listed in locally served zones. The 
expert of the locally served zones registry will also have the responsibility 
to validate reverse entries that will be mirrored from the special registry.

Linking both registries will ensure consistency between the two, with the 
special address registry being the main entry point.

One minor nit, I suspect that the “-bis” in the file name may be misleading for 
some as this is not a bis, but an update.

Cheers,
Med

De : Tim Wicinski <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Envoyé : mardi 2 décembre 2025 20:23
À : list <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Objet : [v6ops] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dnsop-rfc6303-bis-00.txt



Hi

Per discussions with Med and Dave Farmer, I submitted a rough draft to sketch 
out the changes for 6303.
Need to work on the Guidance for Expert Reviewers, but wanted to make a start 
of things.

Feedback Welcome!

tim

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tue, Dec 2, 2025 at 2:21 PM
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-dnsop-rfc6303-bis-00.txt
To: Tim Wicinski <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>


A new version of Internet-Draft draft-dnsop-rfc6303-bis-00.txt has been
successfully submitted by Tim Wicinski and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:     draft-dnsop-rfc6303-bis
Revision: 00
Title:    Revision to Locally Served DNS Zones Registry
Date:     2025-12-02
Group:    Individual Submission
Pages:    4
URL:      https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-dnsop-rfc6303-bis-00.txt
Status:   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dnsop-rfc6303-bis/
HTML:     https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-dnsop-rfc6303-bis-00.html
HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dnsop-rfc6303-bis


Abstract:

   RFC 6063, "Locally Served DNS Zones", defines two IANA registries
   called "IPv4 Locally-Served DNS Zone Registry" and "IPv6 Locally-
   Served DNS Zone Registry".  This document changes the registration
   procedure for that registry from "IETF Review" to "Expert Review".
   This document updates RFC 6063.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to