On Sat, May 09, 2026 at 12:32:14AM +0800, Mukund Sivaraman wrote: > A DNS message is not the appropriate place for this kind of > localization. Space is at a premium (64kB is all there is for the whole > message). India has 22 official languages for example, and it would be > absurd to have as many translations encoded in an EDNS option. > > The objective should be that the language used in the justification text > and organization name is indicated, which it appears the draft provides > for.
Having said this, I realise that the structured-dns-errors draft only
returns the JSON for empty answers (where filtering/blocking/censoring)
has occurred. So there ought to be space in the 64kB in these cases.
However, this localization still seems like it doesn't belong a DNS
response.
Mukund
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
