Hello,

While working on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-keyrestore[0] we found that we needed to force secondary servers to perform an AXFR our zone without checking the serial number in the SOA record. While DNS implementations have knobs to force a transfer from the secondary (e.g. "rndc retransfer" in BIND, "nsd-control force_transfer" in NSD), there is currently no mechanism to make a primary server force its secondaries to perform an AXFR without checking the serial. The below draft introduces such a mechanism.

We think this feature could be more widely beneficial for cases where there is an inconsistency between the view of a zone on a primary and a secondary server not under control of the same operator. We'd love to hear what others think.

Kind regards,
Martin and Florian

[0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-keyrestore/


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-pels-dnsop-axfr-notify-00.txt
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 02:44:19 -0700
From: [email protected]
To: Florian Obser <[email protected]>, Martin Pels <[email protected]>

A new version of Internet-Draft draft-pels-dnsop-axfr-notify-00.txt has been
successfully submitted by Martin Pels and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:     draft-pels-dnsop-axfr-notify
Revision: 00
Title:    AXFR message type for DNS NOTIFY
Date:     2026-05-18
Group:    Individual Submission
Pages:    5
URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-pels-dnsop-axfr-notify-00.txt
Status:   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pels-dnsop-axfr-notify/
HTML: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-pels-dnsop-axfr-notify-00.html
HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-pels-dnsop-axfr-notify


Abstract:

   This document defines a new AXFR message type for DNS NOTIFY
   messages.  The message instructs a secondary server to perform an
   AXFR zone transfer of a zone.



The IETF Secretariat


_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to