Hi Mark,
At 06:40 AM 14-06-2026, Mark E. Jeftovic wrote:
No, our intent is not fixed on publishing
through the Independent Submission Stream. We
submitted the current -00 as individual
Internet-Drafts, and are bringing the DNS-layer
design to DNSOP specifically to get WG review
and guidance on the appropriate path.
If the WG believes the work belongs in DNSOP, we
would be happy to pursue that path, including WG
adoption if there is interest and consensus. If
the WG thinks another path is more appropriate,
we would welcome that guidance as well.
The "Independent Submission" label in the
current draft was an artifact of earlier
authoring/template work and should be treated as
a header mistake. We can correct it in the next revision.
Thanks for the above information.
According to Section 1 of
draft-noss-jeftovic-groundmark-core-00, the
proposal is related to X402. There are other
proposals related to X402. A x402 Foundation is
expected to be established. My guess is that
someone would have to talk to the appropriate
contact at that end to find out what to do about those proposals.
The DNS angle is quite straight-forward given
that there is already 14 "TXT" registrations in
the "Underscored and Globally Scoped DNS Node
Names" registry (RFC 8552). If I am not
mistaken, the requests are sent through IANA lately.
The DNSOP question could be about the TTL of
"_agentclaim" records (Section 4.2 of the draft).
Section 7 of the draft explains why DNSSEC validation is required.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
