Ondřej: If I were the moderator, this is what I'd do: Post a message making three points:
- Say you are going to come up with guidelines. - Tell everyone what you just said "Personally, I think it is reasonable to require to disclose the usage of any tools that had been used to prepare materials submitted to IETF" as your interim policy. As a moderator, you have this right. - And, this is important, tell random people to refrain from playing vigilantes. Good luck. Bob Traverz On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 11:43 PM Ondřej Surý <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 22. 6. 2026, at 18:01, Ben Schwartz <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2026 at 7:09 PM S Kishore <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Regarding the LLM: I did not know there was a policy saying that > AI-assisted messages should say so. > > > > To be clear, those recommendations are only my own, not the IETF's. > > This is certainly going to be a something for the IETF to solve, but from > our perspective, > we would like the humans to speak to humans even if the messages are > flawed and not > in the impeccable English. This is preferable to AI-generated or > AI-assisted messages > to the mailing list. > > The publishing houses like Elsevier now require AI-assistance disclosure > and what type > of assistance was provided by the Large Language Models, and I am quite > confident that > we will have to come up with a similar policy, but so far we don't have > one. > > Personally, I think it is reasonable to require to disclose the usage of > any tools that had > been used to prepare materials submitted to IETF. > > Ondrej > -- > Ondřej Surý (He/Him) > [email protected] > > A gentle nudge is always appreciated if I take a little longer to reply. > > _______________________________________________ > art mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
