>This feels a little clunky / hacky, and I think something more along the lines >of: >"The server should add the ERROR_TTL resource record (code TBD) to the >additional section of the reply. The server SHOULD keep the Answer and >Authority sections empty and the ERROR_TTL record SHOULD be the first >record of the Additional section." instead. New RR types are (still) cheap, >and not overloading an existing RR type seems to keep the intent clear. > >I also think that the document should provide a bit more guidance on what >the server might want to set the TTL value to. > >But, these are just niggles, the base idea seems great,
The current idea is to make processing similar to processing of NXDOMAIN. But that might be overdoing it and new record might be better approach. I have no strong feelings about weither way. It is hard to say much in general about the TTL value. But we can certainly try. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
