> Not only that, no. Given the problems that other groups have had > well-documented problems with experimental ranges (code $experimental1 > is used for FALCON testing, later FALCON is assigned code $real1, > now developers have to guess how long to keep using $experimental1), > we think that using 253-with-lead-in is actually better for the > community.
>From a developer point of view, this is exactly the same problem. For the question how long to support $experimental1 it doesn't matter whether it is an expiremental code point or a third-party registry built on top of a an extension mechanism for private algorithms. It would be different if 253 was used as intended and some organisation would promise to keep a certain domain name for the next couple of decades to gether with descriptive names that unlikely to be re-used. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
