On 17. 06. 26 12:47, Joe Abley wrote:
Babak, Sebastiaan and I put pen to paper and came up with the following:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrokhi-dnsop-ede-nta/
https://github.com/farrokhi/id-ede-nta (working copy)
Good idea!
In section 2:
This EDE is intended for use in DNS responses sent by a DNS resolver with a
configured NTA and SHOULD NOT be included in other responses. For example, a
DNS response sent by an authoritative-only DNS server, which does not perform
validation and hence has no obvious use for an NTA, SHOULD NOT include this EDE.
Why not MUST NOT?
I think an occurrence of SHOULD NOT should (see what I did there) have
an explanation under what conditions it can be violated, and I can't
think of any.
Personally I think machine parseable EXTRA-TEXT would be a good idea.
Something like
{"d": "example.com", "e": "2026-07-30T00:00:00Z"}
or so.
--
Petr Špaček
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
