It appears that Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >So, the question is: do we want delext to make it possible to define > >new parent-side types that work with NS?
I'm having no luck coming up with a plausible use case. Any DS2 type will be newer than DELEG, so any resolver that understands DS2 will presumably also understand DELEG. I'm trying to imagine a reason you'd take a pre-DELEG resolver and hack DS2 support into it rather adding it to your current DELEG-aware resolver. But my imagination isn't that good. R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
