On 04. 08. 26 22:00, Ben Schwartz wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 3:35 PM Bill Woodcock <[email protected]> wrote:
On Aug 4, 2026, at 21:31, Ben Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote:
Has anyone deployed something like this?
Yes, but (one of the) important improvements here is standards-based
interoperability.
I fully agree. My question is whether we should be pursuing this
architecture (an O(N) response "broadcast" for cache sharing), as
opposed to some other architecture (such as a multilayer cache
architecture). Are you running broadcast-style cache sharing in
production?
It does not have to be broadcast, does it? Generally it is discretion of
the sender to whom it will get delivered, and I would expect great
variety in strategies here. E.g. not sending NXDOMAINs unless they pass
some heuristic etc.
From what I have heard there are/were at least two proprietary
deployments of this strategy which operate(d) similarly to this, but I
have not seen the code for this.
--
Petr Špaček
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
