It appears that Wes Hardaker <[email protected]> said: >Roy Arends <[email protected]> writes: > >> I think there may be a misunderstanding about the purpose of these >> ranges. > >As I said, I think the purpose has changed from where it started (or my >memory is bad). It's fine if it's changed of course, but we should then >ask is it needed given the underlying assumptions have changed. > >> The question the ranges answer is simple: when constructing a >> referral, should this Delegation Type be included, and should the NS >> RRset also be included?
Per recent mail, there's a separate question for the type 3 records: is this a record that is authoritative at the delegation point in the parent, even though it is not involved in referrals. I think that's OK but I'd like the document to be very clear that's how it works. R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
